Nov 02 2009
The Art of Street Begging
I was walking down a dim alley around 10 ‘o clock one night after my English class. I was following a rugged boy of about 6 years old. Dressed in stingy clothes, he had a proof of a day’s exposure to sweat, smoke and dust. Seemed to me he hadn’t taken a bath for days nor washed his clothes. Unlike others who would raise an eyebrow to such an awkward state of his, politicizing in their heads whether it is reasonable to even lend that poor kid a dole out cent or not, arguing further that giving alms would make them accomplices to the crimes of that kid’s irresponsible parents, I was contemplating on giving him a share of my part-time fee that night.
I was reaching to my purse when another boy twice his age bragged his alms money to that kid. To my surprise, the latter pulled out from his pocket a couple of bills neatly folded then boasted his day’s earnings with satirical smile. I was drawn to his pitiful condition not knowing that underneath those crummy shorts was a great deal of cash. I call it his day’s talent fee for displaying the art of street begging. His looks would knock down the sensitivities of any man, melt even the sturdiest of hearts, just like hypnosis that makes one reach out to his pocket and unconsciouly turn in some coins. And when the kid runs farther away, one is left wondering if the amount given would even suffice to fill the boy’s gnawing stomach. Then one feels guilty for having given less.
But when that kid raised his hand to flaunt the money he “extorted” from unassuming passers-by, it dawned on me, not everything is what it seems. I felt tricked, for one moment, and “reaching out” seemed to have lost all nobility because the people we think too helpless may actually be “able.” I felt critical of every street children trying to hone their craft in begging, mastering the sad look on their faces, the deep pathethic stare, the lowly voice that sends the tone of depravity.
Then I walked passed the kid whom I was initially worried about, dropping the coins back to my purse because the boy apparently has more than enough for the day. I reconsidered my thoughts while I turned to the corner of that street. I sensed a sudden annoyance about what I saw, but I realized, there is no point of argument to it. They are what they are because life was difficult and at such a young age they carry the burden of everyday survival on their own. They are robbed of the chance to be carefree children while many others of their age have the luxury of time to dream and play. Yet the children of the streets are forced by circumstance, standing on their posts to beg because their survival instict tells them so. Many of them are faced with life’s harsh realities which they need to deal with every day.
While some of us can come up with reasons not to give alms and shrug our shoulders whenever they follow us around, I refuse to dwell on political or economic arguments relating to poverty. That we should not dole out because we condone indolence. That we should simply ignore them because giving out encourages dependence. That we should restrain because the supposed people responsible for them ought to take responsibility. That these kids’ drama should not be tolerated by society. The list goes on. The debates fire up. Yet the facts remain: that they are running dark alleys at midnight when they are supposed to be home; that their feet are bare when we have a pair of imported shoes on; that they may have rolled bills in their cruddy pockets after going person to person to beg but many children out there effortlessly get the best of allowance from their rich parents; that their skins have been sun burnt and they breathe smoke from vehicles thruout the day. The fact remains that their parents are lazy, illiterate and could not secure a descent job yet ignoring that child will not make his parents realize their irresponsibilities and that child will still be hungry after we rationalize the reasonableness of our refusal to feed him; that these kids don’t go to school and may never know the leisure and pleasure of being educated; that they may be bullied by some teenage boys who envy their hard-earned money; and, that they are an open prey to addicts, pedophiles, maniacs and syndicates while they walk along the streets. And that they have to cross against speeding cars, while many affluent children have playgrounds within their backyard and are far more secured.
We say that giving in to them proliferates many of their kind. It is pity that initially moves us to reach out, but it is the attitude of love that makes us act out. It is love that wraps it up. And we do not rationalize love. At least in this case. We simply should respond. The fact remains that most of them don’t have a home to go to; their food are scanty most of the time; they sleep unprotected somewhere and they have newspapers for a blanket and pieces of scraps from the dump to lay their tired body on.
The fact remains that you and I grew up to an entirely different world from theirs, where food is not a scarcity and we wake up every morning with breakfast on the table or sleep to bedtime stories while hugging our favorite toy, and we do not have to look through the glass window while feeling envious with other kids who eat to their hearts’ content. Truth is, giving (and caring) solves one thing, not giving (or not caring) does not solve anything at all. Perhaps, that rugged boy has irresponsible parents; perhaps the government falls short in addressing poverty; perhaps we condone indolence. Perhaps. But here is something certain: that boy is lacking much in life that he does not need to deal with the arguments around him. He simply wants to survive. Like we all do. And he does not need cynics to make matters worse than it already is. He does not need be blamed for what his parents have not done for him, does he? When we reach out to a child like him, it is more than pity that drives us, it is more of love — that pleasant aspect of human nature that is capable of creating ripples of hope in the lives of even the unsuspecting strangers like the children of the streets.

